What Changes When Social and Emotional Learning Reaches Scale?

Key Points

• Relationships and developmental conditions—not just curricula or competencies—are the primary drivers of successful, large-scale SEL, creating school environments grounded in trust, safety, belonging, and meaningful student participation.
• Evidence from Delhi’s Happiness Curriculum and Uttarakhand’s Anandam Pathyacharya shows that SEL can improve student well-being, resilience, empathy, and relationships across diverse contexts when learning experiences foster reflection, student voice, and supportive teacher-student relationships.
• Scaling SEL requires preserving shared developmental principles while adapting implementation to local contexts, with education systems rethinking assessment, professional learning, leadership, and school structures to sustain the conditions in which students thrive.

Across contexts, evidence shows that social and emotional learning (SEL) contributes to students’ well-being, meaningful relationships, academic engagement, and long-term life outcomes. Governments are increasingly embedding SEL within public education systems through curricula, teacher development, competency frameworks, and assessment. These remain essential. Yet our research across two large-scale public education initiatives in India—Delhi’s Happiness Curriculum and Anandam Pathyacharya—suggests that they are only part of the story. 

A Key Insight

The primary unit of change in large-scale SEL is the relationship between learners and the developmental conditions in which learning takes place: time, trust, safety, relationships, and participation.  

This insight emerged through independent evaluations of these two statewide SEL initiatives in India:

• Delhi’s Happiness Curriculum is implemented across one of the world’s largest urban public school systems. 
• Uttarakhand’s Anandam Pathyacharya is a well-being initiative across public schools serving largely rural and geographically dispersed mountainous communities. 

Both these curricula are contextualised to the population they serve. Drawing on surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions, the evaluations involved nearly 3,000 students and more than 400 teachers. 

Across both systems, students reported significant improvements in emotional and psychological well-being, resilience, empathy, interpersonal relationships, social support, and coping with stress. Teachers reported stronger capacities to facilitate reflection, strengthen relationships, and cultivate more supportive classroom environments.  

A Different Experience of School

Students did not describe SEL primarily as a programme or as a set of competencies they acquired. They described a different experience of school. 

In Delhi, students described classrooms where their own experiences became material for learning and there were no fixed correct answers. Students who had often remained invisible within academically driven classrooms found new ways to participate and contribute. One teacher reflected that “there is no pressure to complete in one year, we can stick with the pace of the students.” 

In Uttarakhand, teachers described similar developmental shifts despite working within very different geographical, cultural, and institutional realities. They observed that students became calmer and better prepared to engage with academic learning when the day began with Anandam classes. Students shared that classrooms have become a space for reflection, teachers listen deeply, multiple perspectives coexist, and participation became more important than voicing the correct answer. 

If scaling SEL simply meant replicating programmes, we might expect students to describe fundamentally different experiences in Delhi and Uttarakhand. Instead, they consistently described similar developmental shifts in how they experienced school. This suggests that what scales is the capacity of education systems to create locally meaningful pathways towards shared developmental needs of belonging, dignity, agency, emotional safety and meaningful participation. 

Challenging a Central Assumption

This challenges a central assumption underlying large-scale SEL implementation: that scaling requires standardisation. Standardisation risks reproducing the outward forms of SEL while losing the developmental conditions that give those forms meaning. SEL scales most effectively when shared developmental principles are preserved but interpreted within local contexts. 

As classrooms become more participatory and teachers shift from delivering content to facilitating reflection, relationships become more trusting and students experience a greater sense of belonging. The ways schools cultivate these experiences will vary across cultures, histories, and communities. It is this local meaning that prevents SEL from becoming a ritual of implementation and enables belonging, agency, and participation. 

Assessment and Policy

This shift in perspective has important implications for SEL assessment. Existing frameworks have become increasingly sophisticated in measuring changes in students’ competencies and well-being. They are considerably less equipped to examine whether schools themselves become more participatory, psychologically safe, relational, and developmentally responsive. Developmental conditions must also become part of what we measure.  

The implications for policy are equally significant. Scaling SEL cannot be reduced to introducing another curriculum into already crowded school timetables. It requires rethinking the wider architecture of schooling—accountability systems, professional learning, leadership, assessment, and organisational norms that shape whether relational work is genuinely possible.  

This is the next frontier for the global SEL movement. Rather than asking how programmes can reach more children, we need to ask how education systems preserve shared developmental principles while creating locally meaningful conditions through which every young person can thrive. 

The views in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of CASEL.

Sreehari Ravindranath is Director of Research and Impact at Dream a Dream, where he leads research, evaluation, and systems transformation initiatives focused on social and emotional learning, well-being, and thriving in public education systems. 

Suchetha Bhat is Chief Executive Officer of Dream a Dream. She has spent more than two decades working to transform education systems so that every young person, particularly those growing up in contexts of adversity, can thrive. 

Related Posts

• The Digital Divide: Building a Holistic Education Ecosystem in Kenya and Beyond
• One Man’s Passion for Transforming Nigeria’s Education Sector With Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) 
• Social and Emotional Learning in Kenya: Viewing Classrooms Through the Educators’ Lens

Write for Us

Are you interested in writing for CASEL’s blog, Constellations? Learn more about what we’re looking for and how to pitch your idea!

Learn With Us!

With Belonging & Engagement in the Classroom, you can provide your team with the foundational SEL knowledge to create a learning environment where all students thrive academically and personally. This comprehensive, self-paced virtual training series can be taken individually or as a group PD series. Group rates available!