Spanish versions of parent handouts from SEL Parent Packet: 10 Cosas para Hacer en…
SEL is the process through which children and adults acquire the knowledge, attitudes, and skills they need to recognize and manage their emotions, demonstrate caring and concern for others, establish positive relationships, make responsible decisions, and handle challenging situations constructively. Although SEL is not a program, many available programs provide instruction in and opportunities to practice, apply, and be recognized for using SEL skills. Competence in the use of SEL skills is promoted in the context of safe and supportive school, family, and community learning environments in which children feel valued and respected and connected to and engaged in learning. SEL is fundamental not only to children’s social and emotional development but also to their health, ethical development, citizenship, motivation to achieve, and academic learning as well. (Elias et al., 1997, and CASEL, Safe and Sound, 2005)
There are a great deal of data indicating that large numbers of children are contending with significant social, emotional, and mental health barriers to their success in school and life. In addition, many children engage in challenging behaviors that educators must address to provide high quality instruction. Data from the 2005 Youth Risk Behavior Survey stated that:
Data on developmental assets considered important to children’s mental health and social/emotional development are also cause for concern.
A 2003 Search Institute survey of 202 U.S. communities found that:
Data reported by the Illinois Children’s Mental Health Task Force in its 2003 Final Report state that:
Providing children with comprehensive social and emotional learning (SEL) programs characterized by safe, caring, and well-managed learning environments and instruction in social and emotional skills addresses many of these learning barriers through enhancing school attachment, reducing risky behaviors and promoting positive development, and thereby positively influencing academic achievement.
Our emotions and relationships affect how and what we learn and how we use what we learn in work, family, and community contexts. On the one hand, emotions can enable us to generate an active interest in learning and sustain our engagement in it. On the other hand, unmanaged stress and poor regulation of impulses interfere with attention and memory and contribute to behaviors disruptive to learning. Moreover, learning is an intrinsically social and interactive process: it takes place in collaboration with one’s teachers, in the company of one’s peers, and with the support of one’s family. Hence, the abilities to recognize and manage emotions and establish and maintain positive relationships impact both preparation for learning and the ability to benefit from learning opportunities. Because safe, nurturing, well-managed learning environments are essential to the mastery of SEL skills, they too are essential to children’s school and life success. SEL skills and the supportive learning environments in which they are taught contribute to the resiliency of all children—those without identified risks and those at-risk for or already exhibiting emotional or behavioral problems and in need of additional supports.
Socially and emotionally competent children and youth are skilled in five core areas:
Effective instructional methods for teaching SEL skills are active, participatory, and engaging. Here are a few examples:
As the primary leader in a local school, principals have a major responsibility for implementing SEL programming. Principals can support SEL programming by:
In addition to providing instruction in social and emotional skills, teachers’ involvement in promoting SEL goes beyond the classroom and includes the following:
Parents can promote their child’s SEL by learning more about their school’s SEL initiative and modeling behaviors and adopting practices that reinforce their child’s SEL skills at home. Examples of such efforts include:
More examples of how parents can promote SEL and recommended readings can be found in our free parent packet.
Student support services (SSS) professionals’ knowledge of human behavior, program planning and evaluation, community resources, classroom management strategies, and the challenges to learning that students may be experiencing at home make them valuable members of an SEL steering committee. Their perspective on student needs and the resources being used to address these needs is essential to an adequate SEL needs and resources assessment. Since their work is not confined to the classroom, they also bring an important perspective to identifying school-wide SEL programming needs.
In small group work, SSS professionals can reinforce classroom instruction in SEL skills with students who need more practice. When conferring with parents on approaches to addressing learning challenges their child is experiencing, SSS professionals can use SEL language, which has been introduced in the classroom. When consulting with teachers on classroom management issues, they can assess problems and suggest solutions with reference to SEL skills and the characteristics of a safe and supportive learning environment. When developing and assessing student progress on IEP goals, they can relate these goals to specific SEL standards. SSS staff are also typically the link between schools and the community-based services that students may access. As such, they can extend the SEL framework to these relationships as well.
Finally, coordinating classroom-based SEL instruction with services provided by student support staff can be especially effective in promoting the school success of children who have social, emotional, and mental health problems that interfere with learning.
Effective SEL programming includes:
Effective SEL programming provides students with opportunities to contribute to their communities, families with opportunities to enhance their children’s social and emotional development, school personnel (administrators, teachers, student support services, and support staff) with ongoing professional development, and community groups that affect the lives of children and youth (e.g., after-school and before-school programs, juvenile justice, mental health and health care providers groups) with opportunities to partner with schools (Elias et al.,1997; and CASEL, Safe and Sound, 2005).
Several hundred studies conducted using experimental designs with control groups have documented the positive effects of SEL programming on children of diverse backgrounds from preschool through high school in urban, suburban, and rural settings. Some of the best reviews of this body of research have been done by Greenberg, et al., 2003; and Zins, et al., 2004). Joe Durlak of Loyola University (Chicago) and Roger Weissberg of the University of Illinois at Chicago have recently completed a research synthesis of 300 studies of such programs. The research clearly demonstrates that SEL programming significantly improves children’s academic performance on standardized tests. Moreover, compared to control groups, children who have participated in SEL programs have significantly better school attendance records, less disruptive classroom behavior, like school more, and perform better in school. The research also indicates that children who have participated in SEL programs are less likely than children in control groups to be suspended or otherwise disciplined. These outcomes have been achieved through SEL’s impact on important mental health variables that improve children’s social relationships, increase their attachment to school and motivation to learn, and reduce anti-social, violent, and drug-using behaviors. The research also indicates that SEL programs with the best outcomes are multi-year in duration, use interactive rather than purely knowledge-based instructional methods, and are integrated into the life of the school rather than being implemented as marginal add-ons. (CASEL, Safe and Sound, 2005)
Many available SEL programs have core elements based on an underlying theory of how desired student changes are achieved. Schools interested in implementing an SEL program are urged to start by familiarizing themselves with a few such programs, as reviewed in CASEL’s Safe and Sound, 2005. This will give them a better understanding of how these programs work and enable them to adapt such a program to meet the needs of their students and get buy-in from their teachers without compromising the integrity of its core elements. Educators who pick and choose activities and strategies from one or more programs run the risk of missing some of these core elements and as a result not achieving the desired results with their students. Such an approach also may contribute to further programmatic fragmentation or result in conflicts with other programs already in place. Using a well-designed and evaluated program is also much less work for educators than creating their own program from pieces of existing programs.
To determine effectiveness, educators must keep two considerations in mind: (1) Getting positive program outcomes depends upon high-quality implementation; (2) Measuring program impacts on school climate and student behavior and academic performance are key indicators of its effectiveness. One tool for monitoring SEL implementation is CASEL’s Practice Rubric for Schoolwide Implementation. The Rubric helps school districts look at what implementation supports they currently have in place and helps them identify next steps they might take to further their implementation. Other evaluation tools can be found in our Assessment section and in our Sustainable Schoolwide Social and Emotional Learning (SEL):Implementation Guide and Toolkit.
SEL addresses the social and emotional variables that place youth at risk for school failure (e.g., lack of attachment to a significant adult, inability to regulate emotions) or promote school success (e.g., ability to empathize with and work with others, effective conflict resolution skills). In addressing these variables, SEL provides educators with a common language and framework to organize their activities, thus overcoming fragmentation, minimizing competition for resources, and undermining program effectiveness. Many examples illustrate this link between SEL and other youth development and prevention initiatives. Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is being used by many Illinois schools as the common basis for their discipline system, and educators are exploring how it relates to the universal programming being implemented to address the SEL standards. Another example is character education, for which SEL can provide an essential skill foundation for achieving positive outcomes such as responsible and respectful behavior. Similarly, service-learning opportunities provide ideal situations for applying SEL skills, while these skills also enhance the quality of service-learning experiences. In health education and promotion classes, SEL skills provide a coordinating framework for addressing the risk and protective factors shared by many health conditions. (CASEL, Safe and Sound, 2005).
As a starting point, school improvement planning teams should examine how current prevention and youth development efforts could be best coordinated to offer quality SEL programming. Are current practices efficient? Is money being spent on redundant or ineffective programming? Can current programming be changed to make it less expensive, or can several existing programs be replaced with one more comprehensive effort? Can an SEL program that effectively prevents disruptive classroom behavior and promotes engagement in learning actually save time and dollars in the long run? Can the instructional day be reallocated to allow time for SEL professional development?
In addition to funds from your own district, some foundations and corporations also support such programming in the communities they serve. Several federal agencies sometimes fund programs related to the SEL standards: