In a recently completed meta-analysis
of close to 700 evaluation studies of SEL programs for children
preschool to high school SEL, participating schools saw a 44% decrease
in suspensions, and a 27% decrease in other disciplinary actions.
SEL programming reduces high-risk behaviors both by enhancing student
attachment to school, and by giving children foundational skills
to make healthy and ethnical choices, resist negative social influences,
and manage their feelings in productive ways.
Because many high-risk behaviors share many of the same risk and
protective factors, and can be addressed by similar prevention strategies,
there is growing national support for a more comprehensive, coordinated
approach that prevents risky behaviors and also promotes positive
youth development (see No New Wars). Social and emotional learning provides
a framework for coordinating school-base prevention efforts, and
utilizes interactive, skills-based prevention approaches found to
be most effective. Moreover, while certain high-risk behaviors may
have greater prevalence in some communities than others, other behaviors
such as substance abuse cross all geographic and economic boundaries,
indicating the need for universal (i.e., involve all children) rather
than selectively targeted approaches to prevention. In addition,
while the majority of children will not repeatedly engage in high-risk
behaviors or experience long-term negative outcomes, an SEL-based
prevention approach strives toward the larger goal of helping all
children become healthy adults, productive workers, and engaged
and contributing citizens (Weissberg 2004 Senate Testimony).
Below is a sample of the research supporting the contention that
SEL interventions reduce high-risk behaviors and promote positive
youth development.
When students are attached to school and to prosocial teachers
and peers, they are more likely to behave in prosocial ways themselves,
and to avoid engaging in highrisk behaviors (Hawkins, Catalano,
& Miller, 1992).
Supporting Evidence
A meta-analysis of 165 studies of schoolbased prevention activities
showed environmentally focused interventions (e.g., establishing
norms for behavior, classroom and instructional management, school
or discipline management interventions, reorganization of grades/classes)
significantly decreased the prevalence of the four outcomes examined:
delinquency, alcohol and drug use, drop out/non-attendance, and
conduct problems (Wilson, Gottfredson, & Najaka, (2001).
Students in schools using a program designed to create more supportive
and cooperative-learning environments had significantly lower rates
of drug use and delinquency than comparison students (Battistich,
Schaps, Watson, Solomon, & Lewis, 2000).
Adolescents’ sense of connectedness to school is associated
with significantly lower rates of emotional distress, suicidal thoughts
and behaviors, violence, substance abuse, and sexual activity. (Resnick,
et al.,1997).
SEL instruction provides students with basic skills, such as good
decision-making and refusal skills, which enable them to successfully
avoid engaging in high-risk behaviors and to participate in behaviors
that support their positive development.
Supporting Evidence
A meta-analysis of 165 studies of schoolbased prevention activities
found interventions with social competency instruction significantly
decreased delinquency, alcohol and drug use, and conduct problems
(Wilson, Gottfredson, & Najaka, 2001).
A review of prevention studies from 1980-1990 found that among
12 categories of programs, comprehensive programs (i.e., those using
several different prevention strategies, but all providing decision
making and resistance skills training) and social influence programs
(i.e., programs teaching about and providing skills to resist social
pressures) were the more effective in preventing or delaying the
onset of substance use (Hansen, 1992).
Reviews of the research on school-based substance abuse and violence
prevention programs indicate that instruction and practice in social
and emotional competencies is a critical element of effective programs
(Dusenbury, & Falco, 1995; Dusenbury, Falco, Lake, Brannigan,
& Bosworth, 1997).
A study by Dennis R. Trinidad and colleagues in the January issue
of the Journal of Adolescent Health (34(1): 46-55) underscores the
importance of including refusal skills and emotional management
skills in smoking prevention programs. The study examined how emotional
intelligence in sixth-graders related to their intentions to smoke
in the future. The students who indicated they were most likely
to smoke in the future were those with low overall emotional intelligence
who also had high levels of hostile feelings, or felt they would
have a hard time refusing cigarette offers. The researchers hypothesize
that these students have trouble decreasing feelings of hostility
by effectively managing their emotions. This study builds on previous
work from this group, which found that seventh- and eighth-graders
with low emotional intelligence were more than two times more likely
to have engaged in smoking behavior.
Complete citations for these studies can be found in our SEL
and Academics Research Brief.
Additional Resources on SEL and Prevention
- School-Based
Prevention: Promoting Positive Social Development through
Social and Emotional Learning. This 2003 American Psychologist
article by Greenberg et al. makes a compelling case for school-based
prevention, summarizes findings of key studies of comprehensive
SEL-based prevention programming, and discusses the role of prevention
programs in the context of other school-wide and district-wide
practices and policies.
- For additional research and readings on this topic, use our Searchable
Research Database. Readings cover topics such as:
- How to develop a coordinated prevention approach
- Characteristics of effective prevention programs
- Barriers to implementation
- Prevalence rates for high-risk behaviors
- Prevention outcomes for specific SEL programs can be found in our
Safe and Sound guide to SEL
programs.
- See our web links section for additional resources on specific
prevention topics.
|