Interstate School Leaders
Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards
In November 1996, the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium
(ISLLC) adopted a set of six standards with supporting knowledge,
dispositions, and performances, that define a vision of educational
leadership excellence for both principals and superintendents. ISLLC
Standards were based on available research linking leadership
and learning outcomes, and the experience of Consortium participants.
They were designed to be compatible with the National Council for
Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) curriculum guidelines
for school administration programs, and major reports on reinventing
leadership for tomorrow’s schools. In developing the Standards,
the Consortium took into account major social and economic changes
affecting our society and changes occurring in the organization
and operation of schools.
Standards
ISLLC Standards define six ways in which school administrators should
provide leadership that promotes the success of all students.
A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the
success of all students by:
- Standard 1
… facilitating the development, articulation, implementation,
and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported
by the school community.
- Standard 2
… advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture
and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff
professional growth.
- Standard 3
… ensuring management of the organization, operations, and
resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.
- Standard 4
… collaborating with families and community members, responding
to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community
resources.
- Standard 5
… acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner.
- Standard 6
… understanding, responding to, and influencing the larger
political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.
CASEL’s current research to promote development of school
leaders with high levels of social and emotional competence—high
“emotional intelligence”—is expected to directly
and positively impact leaders’ abilities to meet the ISSLC
standards.
Leadership Standards Defined by Professional Organizations
Other national professional standards based on ISLLC Standards
include those adopted by the National Association of Elementary
School Principals, Leading
Learning Communities: Standards for What Principals Should Know
and Be Able to Do and the National Association of Secondary
School Principals, 21st
Century School Administrator Skills Self-Assessment and Observer
Assessment. The NAESP standards are closely aligned with
those of ISLLC with a focus on teaching and learning. The NASSP
self-assessment instrument is much more detailed with several assessment
items in each of the following areas: setting instruction direction,
team work, sensitivity to others’ concerns, judgment, results
orientation, organization ability, oral and written communication,
development of others, and understanding one’s own strengths
and weaknesses. While more far-reaching than the NAESP Standards,
the NASSP self-assessment instrument frequently relates the assessed
skills to a focus on teaching and learning.
The
Southern Regional Education Board’s (SREB) Critical Success
Factors for Principals. Although these success factors are not
specifically aligned with ISLLC, like ISLLC, they do repeatedly
reference student success. The factors were identified in SREB studies
of principals published in 2001 as Preparing a New Breed of School
Principals: It’s Time for Action, which focuses on principals
recognized for leading school change that resulted in raising student
achievement levels. These success factors provided the framework
for SREB’s 14
training modules for redesigning leadership preparation programs.
New
Leaders for New Schools’ Selection Criteria. These 10
criteria stress social and emotional competencies and values such
as commitment to on-going learning and belief in the potential of
all children. There is less explicit linkage of the criteria to
student success.
Mid-continent
Research for Education and Learning’s (McREL) 21 Principal
Leadership Responsibilities. These responsibilities constitute
a leadership framework based on a comprehensive analysis of research
on school leadership and its relationship to student achievement
over the last 30 years conducted by Waters, Marzano, and McNulty.
The framework includes specific practices, knowledge, strategies,
tools, and resources that principals need to be effective leaders.
It also includes a “knowledge taxonomy” that organizes
the relevant theoretical literature so that it can be applied to
the 21 leadership responsibilities.
Technology
Standards for School Administrators (TSSA) Collaborative. These
standards specify the integration of technology into the learning
environment and culture, curricular design, instructional strategies,
professional leadership practice, administrative systems, and assessment
and evaluation. These standards also address social, legal, and
ethical issues related to technology and responsible decision making.
The National College for School Leadership in the UK has developed
what it calls “Ten
School Leadership Propositions.”
In addition, many state and local education agencies have developed
their own standards for educational leaders. Many are of these are
aligned with ISLLC standards. An example is the Chicago
Public Schools Principal Competencies.The CPS competencies organize
24 skills into the following five categories (see page 4 of the
linked publication for all 24 skills):
- Develop and Articulate Belief System through Voice and Actions
- Engage and Develop Faculty
- Assess the Quality of Classroom Instruction
- Facilitate/Motivate Change
- Balance Management
|