Educational Leadership » Resources

Available resources:

 

Centers for Educational Leadership

There is a great deal of innovative and original work being done nationally and internationally to support the effective performance of educational leaders. The centers described in this section focus on a broad range of educational issues and provide foundational research and knowledge advancement for the field. In addition, many of the centers provide opportunities for professional development for principals through fellowships, online learning, workshops, and coaching.

  • Institute for Educational Leadership (IEL): This institute seeks to “improve education and the lives of children and their families through positive and visionary change.” To pursue this mission, IEL participates as a partner in several major educational leadership development initiatives, including the School Leadership Shared Learning Community, leadership fellowships, and leadership reports and guidelines. More »
  • Laboratory for Student Success (LSS): This regional educational lab was one of 10 under contract to the U. S. Department of Education until 2006. LSS provided a rich resource for research-based educational reform, and their educational leadership reports and recommendations remain available online. More »
  • National College for School Leadership in the UK (NCSL): The National College was founded with the mission of providing a “well-led school” for every child and assuring that every school leader is a “learner.” NCSL has responsibility for (1) developing and supporting school leaders throughout all stages of their careers, (2) conducting research and development related to school leadership, and (3) providing on-line learning and networking opportunities for school leaders throughout their careers. More »
  • Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) Leadership Learning-centered Program: This board is the nation's first interstate compact for education. Its purpose is to help government and educational leaders in members states advance education and, thereby, the social and economic life of the region. The program works to improve leadership preparedness programs, has designed curriculum modules for university leadership courses, and funds leadership reports. More »
  • Stanford Educational Leadership Institute (SELI): This institute is a joint venture of the Stanford School of Education and the Graduate Business School. Its mission is to support the professional development of current and emerging K-12 leaders by applying organizational theory and management principles to the design and management of schools for high performance. The focus of SELI's development efforts is equipping educational leaders to create systems, mobilize resources, develop infrastructures to support their visions, and sustain their staffs through the start-up and institutionalization of school change. More »

Institute for Educational Leadership (IEL)
The Institute for Educational Leadership seeks to “improve education and the lives of children and their families through positive and visionary change.” To pursue this mission, IEL participates as a partner in several major educational leadership development initiatives, which are described on its web site:

In collaboration with the Laboratory for Student Success (LSS) at Temple University, IEL provides support for a network of principals in low performing schools from across the country who are participating in 24 educational leadership development programs funded by the U.S. Department of Education. Through this network (the School Leadership Learning Community or SLLC), established in January 2003, participants are able to communicate across sites, sharing their work and exchange leadership strategies. Several reports summarizing the work of program grantees can be downloaded at no charge. More of SLLC members and information about the work of program grantees is available here.

An influential report of IEL, published in 2002, Leadership for Student Learning: Reinventing the Principalship, asserted that principals in the 21st century must be “instructional leaders,” committed to strengthening teaching and focused on data-driven accountability and practical professional development; “community leaders,” who make the school part of the larger community and engage a range of stakeholders as active school advocates; and “visionary leaders,” who articulate a set of values based on the belief that all children can achieve at high levels and mobilize others to embrace this vision.

IEL's Educational Policy Fellowship provides an opportunity for 200 principals to participate in a 10-month in-service leadership development program that includes national events in Washington, DC, and activities specific to each of 12 state sites.

E-lead website is a free on-line resource provided in collaboration with the Laboratory for Student Success that offers states and districts information about how to provide better professional development for principals. It includes the following 4 components:

  • A LeaderShipShape Blog, offering school leaders news about current relevant research and events
  • A list of resources with links to articles, research, and other tools on such leadership topics as coaching, change management, creating a learning-centered school culture and climate, leadership assessment, visioning, and data-driven decision making
  • Six guiding principles on developing and support school leadership distilled from current professional wisdom and research
  • Descriptions of 17 principal professional development programs from across the U.S., all of which use curricula based on relevant standards of what principals should know and be able to do. Each program is described using a common template that includes a program summary, theory of change, definition of leadership, costs, program's relationship to licensure requirements, standards referenced, etc.

Through a series of multi-sector task forces, including one on “Principal Leadership,” the School Leadership for 21st Century Initiative is developing policies and practices to support creation of a new generation of educational leaders. This initiative, a collaboration of several public and private funders, has developed several reports available for free download from the IEL web site.

return to top

Laboratory for Student Success (LSS)
The Laboratory for Student Success (LSS) was established as the mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory in 1995 and continued to operate as such at the Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education until March 2006. LSS was one of 10 regional educational laboratories under contract to the U. S. Department of Education, LSS provided a rich resource for research-based educational reform, and their products remain available on line.

On May 20-21, 2002, LSS held a national invitational conference on educational leadership in Vienna, Virginia. The conference focused on what educational leaders need to know and be able to do to effectively lead in the 21st century and on how scientific research on educational leadership can be used to improve leadership practice and related policy. The conference was prompted by the 101st yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE), The Educational Leadership Challenge: Redefining Leadership for the 21st Century, edited by Joseph Murphy published in 2002 which addressed the challenges facing educational leaders in the 21st century and proposes some models for change. The volume argued that dramatic political, social, and economic changes, as well as changes within education, call for new ways of organizing and managing schools.

Reports and recommendations from this conference were published in the September 2002 issue of The LSS Review. This issue includes short articles on the following issues addressed at the conference:

  • The evolution of educational leadership
  • The current context facing educational leaders
  • Challenges at the district and school levels
  • School improvement processes and practice
  • Leadership for democratic community
  • Leadership for social justice
  • Reshaping the role of the principal
  • Changes in the superintendency
  • Repositioning lay leadership (both school boards and advisory groups)
  • University education leadership programs
  • Professional development of school leaders

Another resource from LSS, the spring 2005 issue of its LSS Field Notes on Preparing and Supporting School Principals summarizes face-to-face discussions held among program representatives of the Institute for Educational Leadership's (IEL) School Leadership Learning Community (SLLC). In 2002 and 2003, the U.S. Department of Education funded 24 programs to develop and enhance pre- and in-service professional development for educational leaders serving high-need, low-performing schools. All of these programs are collaborations between districts and either universities, community-based organizations, or professional education associations. IEL established the SLLC in January 2003 to provide these leadership preparation programs with a communication and consultation network. The 2005 issue of Field Notes summarizes key points from these discussions.

return to top

National College for School Leadership in the UK (NCSL)
The National College was founded by British Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1998 with the mission of providing a “well-led school” for every child and assuring that every school leader is a “learner.” NCSL is a government agency, not a degree-granting institution of higher education. NCSL has responsibility for (1) developing and supporting school leaders throughout all stages of their careers, (2) conducting research and development related to school leadership, and (3) providing on-line learning and networking opportunities for school leaders throughout their careers.

All of NCSL's programs are based on its Leadership Development Framework, the 10 propositions of which describe the essential qualities of school leadership:

  • be purposeful, inclusive and values driven
  • embrace the distinctive and inclusive context of the school
  • promote an active view of learning
  • be instructionally focused
  • be a function that is distributed throughout the school community
  • build capacity by developing the school as a learning community
  • be futures oriented and strategically driven
  • be developed through experiential and innovative methodologies
  • be served by a support and policy context that is coherent and implementation driven
  • be supported by a National College that leads the discourse around leadership for learning

School leadership development programs created and implemented by the National College are grouped by the stage of a school leader's career that each supports. These loose and overlapping career stages, as identified in a “Think Tank” report developed by a group of educators across the UK, and the programs included in each are as follows:

Programs for “emergent leaders” provide development and support for teachers just beginning to take on leadership and management responsibilities. These include (a) a fast track program for those who have demonstrated outstanding leadership early in their careers; (b) a program extending over 1-2 years with modules that allow for personalized learning at one's own pace; (c) an “equal access to promotion program for black and ethnic minority teachers in middle management;” (d) a 10-month program for groups of 2-4 middle-level leaders from primary, secondary, or special schools working with a coach; and (e) a program designed to meet the needs of women transitioning from middle to senior leadership.

The “established leader program” for assistant and deputy head teachers (i.e. principals) who are not seeking to become head teachers but want to enhance their leadership skills.

The National Professional Qualification for Headship (NPQH) for “entry to leadership” is intended for preparing candidates for head teacher positions. This credential will be required of all new head teachers by 2009. The NPQH is a 6-15 month program, depending on a candidate's needs, that combines on-line learning and self-study with face-to-face events and visits to other schools. This program is based on the UK's National Standards for Headteachers, published in Sept 2004 and available for purchase on-line. Also included in programs for “entry to leadership” is the Early Headship Provision (EHP), which provides learning opportunities appropriated to the early years of serving as a head teacher. This program is gradually replacing the Headteacher Induction Programme (HIP).

In the “advanced leadership” career stage, NCSL offers the Leadership Programme for Serving Headteachers (LPSH), which is open to those with three or more years of experience as a head teacher. It is linked to the NPQH and aligned with the National Standards. It provides a flexible and personalized approach to professional development.

Finally, for those with more experience as a head teacher, there is the Development Programme for Consultant Leadership, which enables school leaders to further develop their facilitation, mentoring, and coaching skills.

NCSL also offers “strategic programmes” that focus on various leadership issues or leadership in particular types of schools.

All NCSL programs are taught not by full-time faculty but by “teams of facilitators” whose members are experienced and successful head teachers.

The NCSL web site also offers a superb, vast library of research and position papers on all aspects of the principalship.

return to top

Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) Leadership Learning-centered Program
The Southern Regional Education Board (SREB), founded in 1948 by Southern states, is the nation's first interstate compact for education. Its purpose is to help government and educational leaders in members states advance education and, thereby, the social and economic life of the region.

Funded by the Wallace Foundation, SREB's Leadership Learning-centered Program stimulates and supports the efforts of member states to strengthen the preparation of school leaders to improve school and classroom practices for student achievement. Through this program, SREB works with 12 urban school districts and their university partners to redesign school leadership preparation programs. (See description of the LEAD—Leadership for Educational Achievement in Districts--program in the Wallace Foundation web page.)

In addition to LEAD, the Leadership Learning-centered Program includes two other major efforts: (1) the preparation of reports pointing out the need for change in how educational leaders are trained and recommending research-based practices and processes for addressing these needs and (2) the design of 14 curriculum modules intended to help state academies and university preparation programs equip principals and school leadership teams to improve instructional programs and student performance.

return to top

Stanford Educational Leadership Institute (SELI)
The Stanford Educational Leadership Institute is a joint venture of the Stanford School of Education and the Graduate Business School and is funded by the Goldman-Sachs, and the Wallace and Ford Foundations. Its mission is to support the professional development of current and emerging K-12 leaders by applying organizational theory and management principles to the design and management of schools for high performance. The Institute is interested in developing educational entrepreneurs rather than administrators who will simply manage systems already in place. The focus of SELI's development efforts is equipping educational leaders to create systems, mobilize resources, develop infrastructures to support their visions, and sustain their staffs through the start-up and institutionalization of school change.
SELI programs train leaders to “rethink” organizations, launch new school designs, and manage the change process.

A key component of SELI educational leadership training is the use of case studies.

SELI programs include:

  • The Executive Program for Educational Leaders (EPEL), a one-week residential academy for educational teams of superintendents, teacher union heads, principals, school board members, and lead teachers
  • The Superintendent Fellows Program, an on-going program of short master classes, on-line virtual classes, and linked community for Bay Area superintendents
  • The Leadership Study Tours, which affords leaders the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the design features of highly effective small schools through on-site visits, including visits to the Julia Richman Educational Complex in New York City, to which Deborah Meier was a leading contributor
  • Other SELI course offerings focus on organizational trust, transformational learning, and leadership and change

SELI also offers a joint MA (Policy and Organizational Leadership Studies)/MBA degree program
Stanford Leadership Study: This three-year study (Dec 2003-Dec 2006 is analyzing the content, structure, and context of exemplary principal preparation and in-service programs to determine whether their graduates exhibit effective practice as school leaders. The research is developing in-depth case studies of eight preparation programs in five states, supplemented by surveys of a national comparison sample of school principals. The case studies will include analyses of the institutional and organizational infrastructure at the state and district levels that fosters development of these programs and a study of the leadership practice of program graduates. The surveys will document the preparation and leadership practices of the comparison group of principals. It is expected that study findings will increase knowledge of principal development programs that advance graduates' leadership capabilities and assist universities, local districts, and schools in conducting, supporting, and financing training for principals.

return to top

» print this page

 

 
©2000-2006 CASEL. All rights reserved.
Working to establish social and emotional learning as an essential part of education
from preschool through high school.